Connect with us

NEWS

Hospitals Seek a Medicaid Rollback Patients Cannot Wait For

Hospital lobbyists want Medicaid cuts rolled back, yet the rural fund caps hospital care pay at 15 percent before 2027 work rules hit.

Published

on

Hospital lobbyists are trying to unwind $911 billion in federal Medicaid cuts, even as a rural fund sold as relief limits what hospitals can collect for care.

Grant money is already moving to states. The coverage losses that will show up in emergency rooms mostly start after the November 2026 midterms.

A Coverage Cliff After the Midterms

KFF’s allocation of Congressional Budget Office figures puts the July 2025 tax law’s federal Medicaid cut at $911 billion over 10 years after overlapping provisions are netted out. CBO also estimates the health provisions in the 2025 reconciliation law will leave 10 million more people uninsured in 2034, including 7.5 million who lose Medicaid or CHIP.

The law is P.L. 119-21, signed on July 4, 2025. Its largest coverage cut is a community-engagement test for many expansion adults, scored at 5.3 million more uninsured in 2034 before interactions. Other pieces freeze or shrink the provider taxes and extra state payments that hospitals use to lift Medicaid rates.

Hospital executives have been calling members of Congress for a year about those payment pieces. Patients feel a different clock. CBO’s coverage losses stay relatively small in 2026, then jump once states have to run the work test.

THE CUTS ON THE CALENDAR

  1. July 4, 2025: President Trump signs P.L. 119-21, tying tax cuts to Medicaid, marketplace, and rural-health changes.
  2. December 29, 2025: CMS awards Rural Health Transformation Program money to all 50 states.
  3. June 1, 2026: CMS issues an interim final rule on Medicaid community engagement.
  4. January 1, 2027: States must generally start the 80-hour monthly work test, unless they choose an earlier date.
  5. Fiscal 2028 to 2032: Expansion states phase most provider-tax limits down from 5.5 percent to 3.5 percent.

That sequence is why hospital lobbyists talk about a long-shot rollback while the November election is still ahead of the hard coverage drop. Democrats have already spent nearly $15 million on ads that mention health care cuts, and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said in July that his party has started talking about what it would reverse if it retakes the Senate, with no decisions made.

The Rural Fund Caps What Hospitals Can Collect

Congress added a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program, $10 billion a year from 2026 through 2030, after rural-state Republicans balked at the Medicaid title. CMS on December 29, 2025, posted first-year awards averaging $200 million, from $147.3 million in New Jersey to $281.3 million in Texas.

KFF finds federal Medicaid spending in rural areas still falls about $137 billion over 10 years. Half the new fund is split equally, so every approved state is slated for $100 million a year from that half no matter how many rural residents it has. Texas, with about 4.3 million rural residents, gets $66 per rural resident in 2026. New Jersey gets $1,069. Alaska gets $990. Rhode Island, an outlier with a tiny rural count, gets $6,305.

The deeper limit is how states may spend it. KFF, reading CMS rules, says patient-care payments cannot exceed 15 percent of the money, with building and infrastructure work capped at 20 percent. Fifteen percent of $50 billion is $7.5 billion over five years, an upper bound if every state hits the ceiling.

FIRST-YEAR RURAL FUND AWARDS

State FY2026 award Per rural resident
Texas $281,319,361 $66
Alaska $272,174,856 $990
Kentucky $212,905,591 Not published in the KFF per-resident set cited here
Maine $190,008,051 Not published in the KFF per-resident set cited here
New Jersey $147,250,806 $1,069

State plans on file lean toward telehealth, remote monitoring, workforce pipelines, food-as-medicine projects, and equipment. Alaska’s abstract includes drones for prescription runs and surgical robotics. CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz called the rollout a milestone for rural access. The grant design still treats hospitals as one vendor among many, not as the payee for lost Medicaid census.

Kentucky Shows Where the Money Goes

That design is already a political fight in Kentucky, which drew $212.9 million for the first year. Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, has said a Senate Democratic analysis using Sheps Center methods flagged 35 Kentucky rural hospitals as high-risk, and he has put 250,000 coverage losses and 20,000 health jobs on the same ledger. Rep. Andy Barr, a Republican running for Senate, wrote him on August 25, 2026, asking why the new federal money was not being used to keep those hospitals open.

Beshear answered on September 1 that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz had said in an op-ed that the dollars cannot be used to fund struggling hospitals. He also said the $212 million will not close a gap he put at $21 billion for the state under the tax law.

Barr is making the argument hospital lobbyists want voters to hear, that a rural fund should stabilize emergency rooms. Beshear is describing the program CMS actually built, a transformation grant with a hard cap on paying for care. Both can be right about the paperwork and still leave a county hospital short of cash.

Hawley Is Trying to Unwind His Own Bill

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) voted for the tax law, then on July 15, 2025, introduced the Protect Medicaid and Rural Hospitals Act. The bill would repeal the provider-tax freeze and the state-directed-payment caps, double the rural fund to $100 billion, and stretch it from five years to 10. The American Hospital Association backed it. Hawley said Missouri would see an extra $1 billion for hospitals over four years from the fund he helped add to the original law.

President Trump has always said we have to protect Medicaid for working people. Now is the time to prevent any future cuts to Medicaid from going into effect. We should also increase our support for rural hospitals around the country.

Sen. Josh Hawley, statement, July 15, 2025

He later told interviewers he still hopes to pull colleagues back as start dates get close, and that rural hospitals should be funded directly. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) had already voiced worry about the Medicaid title. In June 2026 Hawley added a separate rural emergency-room bill that would send eligible hospitals a baseline $1 million a year, indexed for inflation, through the Health Resources and Services Administration.

Repealing part of a reconciliation law still takes offsets and a president who has to sign the change. Even a Democratic Senate in 2027 would be negotiating with that White House. Hospital lobbyists know the full $911 billion is not coming back in one vote. They are shopping delays, carveouts, and extra checks from other federal accounts.

Congress Has Less Patience for Big Systems

A Chartis review of more than 2,000 rural hospitals found more than 40 percent operating in the red and about 417 vulnerable to closure, with median Medicaid revenue around $3.9 million. The National Rural Health Association counts more than 200 rural hospitals closed or converted since 2010. Those are the facilities that cannot wait on a 2028 White House.

Large systems can merge, add non-Medicaid revenue, and keep K Street retainers. They are also the ones members now put in the hot seat. Max Seltzer, health policy director for Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), told a FamiliesUSA event in July that hospital costs are impossible to ignore once a 990 form shows a $6 million CEO.

I can go look at your 990 form and see that your CEO got paid $6 million, not a lot of sympathy.

Max Seltzer, health policy director for Sen. Roger Marshall, FamiliesUSA event, July 2026

Paragon Health Institute, which helped shape the 2025 Medicaid fight, came back this spring arguing that hospital prices have outrun wages and that 340B discounted drug purchases rose from $5 billion in 2010 to more than $81 billion in 2024. AHA called that work distorted. Hospitals are still defending 340B while CMS has proposed cutting 340B outpatient drug pay and tightening the same provider taxes KFF says will total $98.6 billion in 2026, $61.8 billion of that from hospital taxes.

On September 2, 2026, hospital executives said two new CMS tax-and-payment rules go further than Congress wrote and opened another lobbying wave as the agency reviews comments. Lisa Harvey-McPherson, vice president of government relations at Northern Light Health in Maine, had already warned that delay politics will dwarf every other hospital ask, from base rates to paperwork relief. James Jarvis, president of the Maine Medical Association, said he has heard bipartisan talk that something must be done and still thinks it will take a catastrophe.

What Patients Lose If the Rollback Fails

The people with the least room to wait are not on those 990 forms. CMS says 43 states and the District of Columbia must run a work requirement by January 1, 2027 for many non-pregnant adults ages 19 to 64 in the expansion group. The floor is 80 hours a month of work, job programs, or community service, half-time school, or income of at least $580 a month at the 2026 federal minimum wage. New applicants may have to show a qualifying month before they enroll. People who fail a check get 30 days, then can lose coverage and reapply.

The secretary may grant good-faith delays only through December 31, 2028. Territories are out. So are several groups the rule lists as exempt, which is the practical map of who still has a safety net and who is filling out timesheets.

WHO DOES NOT HAVE TO MEET THE 80-HOUR TEST

  • Parents and caregivers: Parents, guardians, and family caregivers of a child 13 or under, or of a disabled person, are exempt.
  • Medical and frailty screens: Pregnant and postpartum people, the medically frail, and people in drug or alcohol treatment do not have to meet the hours.
  • Other federal status: American Indians and Alaska Natives, former foster youth, veterans with a total disability rating, and many SNAP or TANF work-rule households are exempt.
  • Optional hardships: States may treat inpatient stays, declared disasters, county unemployment at or above 8 percent or 1.5 times the national rate, and some medical travel as short-term exceptions.

Uninsured expansion adults still walk into the same rural ERs that already run on thin Medicaid margins. When they cannot pay, the bill does not move to a hospital lobbyist in Washington. It sits on the county facility that the rural fund was advertised to save and that the 15 percent cap was written not to retain as a going concern.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has promised hospitals a seat at the table if Democrats take power. The work test, unless a state jumps early or wins a delay, still opens on January 1, 2027. CMS is still taking comment on the tax rules hospitals say cut deeper than the statute. Independent rural hospitals are making payroll against that calendar, not against a 2028 majority.

Disclaimer: This article is news reporting and analysis of federal Medicaid, rural hospital, and coverage policy. It is for information only and is not medical, insurance, or legal advice, and it is not a guide to any person’s eligibility, hospital bill, or enrollment choice. Readers who need help with Medicaid, hospital charity care, or a coverage gap should talk with a clinician, their state Medicaid agency, or a licensed benefits counselor before they act. Dollar figures, award amounts, and start dates follow the agency documents, CBO-based scores, and public statements cited here and can change as rules are finalized or as Congress votes.

Harry is the editor of REMEDIES HEALTH, an independent health title that he owns and runs, covering fitness, nutrition, food, mental health, public health and home remedies. He has been in journalism for ten years, a reporter before he was an editor, with most of that time on health and science, where the gap between a headline and the study behind it is usually the story. Articles are built from peer-reviewed trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, trial registry records, and the guidance published by public health bodies, with each study reported alongside its size, duration, comparator and funding source. Remedies are covered by what the evidence actually shows, including when it shows nothing, and fitness guidance is checked against training research rather than gym folklore. Nutrition numbers are verified against food composition databases before publication. Mistakes are handled under a public corrections policy, and a corrected article carries a note explaining the change. Nothing on the site replaces a clinician; readers with symptoms or on medication should seek proper medical care before changing what they do. Harry answers reader mail at support@remedieshealthfitness.com.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending